Search for: "Hughes v. Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
This archiving of old Judiciary website pages of judgments and orders appears to have been done as part of TNA’s general role as digital archivist of official government department websites, rather than anything specifically to do with court records. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
To help sell the story, the agency named the vessel the Hughes Glomar Explorer. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Events Anya Proops QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jorge Oliveira, Head of Data Protection at FIFA, are running a remote panel session for LawInSport’s annual conference on Tuesday 7 November 2021. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The first is Mastercard Incorporated and Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal considered the correct approach as to determining the value of non-negotiable chips for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]