Search for: "Hughes v. Rose"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
If you've been too wrapped up with preparations for the holiday season, here's a summary of the IP news that you might have missed last week:PatentsThis Kat is still contemplating which IP books to put on her Christmas wish-list...Rose Hughes outlined the recent EPO Board of Appeal decision (T 1356/21), which discussed the criterion of novelty for pharmaceutical dosage regimes and selection inventions, as well as the reliance on an unexpected technical effect… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm
Patents Rose Hughes discussed the interpretation of G2/21 by the Board of Appeal in the T 0116/18 case and the fact that this interpretation considers the rejection of the language of plausibility, the divergence between the EPO and the UK courts and what it requires with regards to the disclosure of a technical effect relied on for inventive step. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 8:56 am
PatentsRose Hughes commented on the recent UK decision Astellas v Teva [2023] EWHC 2571 (Pat), in which the Court considered sufficiency, inventive step and infringement of the formulation patent, and highlighted how the decision is interesting for the consideration of the potential benefits and pitfalls of functional claim language. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The ICO has issued its apology to Dame Alison Rose following an investigation into a complaint from Nigel Farage. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
(Disclosure: I represent Kashtanova in connection with their application to register “Rose Engima. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Patents Rose Hughes reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision in T 423/22 regarding witness credibility and ViCo, where they held that ViCo was a perfectly sufficient format for witness testimony, even when the entire outcome of a case rested on witness evidence. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
Following the judgment there was confusion at the Patent Office.Rose Hughes (photo: Neil Graveney)Rose Hughes focused on plausibility. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:18 pm
Patents The free evaluation of evidence of prior use (T 0042/19)Rose Hughes commented on this European Patent Office Board of Appeal decision, which evaluated the relationship between the principle of the free evaluation of evidence and the competency of the Board of Appeal to overturn findings of fact at first instance. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Patents Rose Hughes analysed the EPO’s recent decision (T 0169/20) which attempts to address the role of the description of a patent in interpreting the language of the claims of a patent. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Acuff-Rose), or is it worse? [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
I don't know whether I rose to the challenge, but I did write an exam. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
For more information, you can refer to PatKat Rose Hughes’ post here. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The decision was authored by Judge Reyna and joined by Judge Hughes. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
Patents SpecialKat Rose Hughes reported and commented on two Board of Appeal decisions: · T-0043/18, which concerns the European Patent Office’s approach to novelty for purity of compound inventions (see here). [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:18 am
Congratulations Rose! [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am
Background and analysis on this is provided by our GuestKat Rose Hughes (see here).DESIGNGuestKat Jan Jacobi reported on the UK Government's response to the consultation on design law, as a result of which the government announced that it had joined the Global Brands Database provided by WIPO. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes has written a report (here) on a recent decision (J8/20) published by the European Patent Office Board of Appeal which shows that AI is not breaking patent law.Miscellaneous The UK Intellectual Property Office has announced new appointments to its board last week. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
The Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report summary and comment can be read here. [read post]
