Search for: "Human Relations v. Dept. of Parks"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Accessible parking creates exactly this kind of problem, as shown in Hume v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
" Part II focused on Jacobson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
Previous summaries of Fourth Circuit criminal and related decisions can be found here. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Zarda brought a claim in the Eastern District of New York alleging sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
When she filed suit the City’s parking violated the requirement that accessible parking spaces be disbursed, but did have the correct number and layout of van accessible spaces. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
As for the CEQA-related claim, the trial court granted the petition to set aside the decision and the City appealed. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
There is no fence or other protective barrier between the car park and the bungalow. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:22 am
In Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act includes such a prohibition. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”) Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
City of New Rochelle, 256 N.Y. 190, 195, 176 N.E. 138 (1931); Office Park Corp. v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204 (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
(Comments are closed as the article relates to ongoing legal proceedings, as Janine Gibson, editor in chief of Guardian US, explained on Twitter. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
WA Dept. of Soc. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
