Search for: "Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Comment k itself refers to drugs, “many of which ... cannot be legally sold except to physicians, or under the prescription of a physician. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
In Grundberg v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
See Labzda v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Heart Physicians, P.C., 3 A.3d 892, 899-900 (Conn. 2010) (applied to medical device); Hurley v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
The same is true of many other drugs, vaccines, and the like, many of which for this very reason cannot legally be sold except to physicians, or under the prescription of a physician. . . . [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
The Heart Physicians, P.C., ___ A.3d ___, 2010 WL 3488962 (Conn. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
Heart Physicians, P.C., 898 A.2d 777 (Conn. 2006). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:22 am
Heart Physicians, P.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
The Heart Physicians, P.C., 898 A.2d 777, 783 (Conn. 2006); Vitanza v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Heart Physicians, P.C., 898 A.2d 777, 783-84 (Conn. 2006).Delaware: Lacy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
" Slip op. at 5, citing Hurley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Heart Physicians, P.C., 898 A.2d 777, 783-84 (Conn. 2006); Vitanza v. [read post]