Search for: "Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp."
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Coupled with plaintiff's testimony that all the other doors in the building had doorstops, an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants should have noticed the "visible and apparent" condition that the subject door was missing a doorstop, posing a foreseeable risk that the door could slam a person's hand into the wall (Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66, 83 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).THIS… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Coupled with plaintiff's testimony that all the other doors in the building had doorstops, an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants should have noticed the "visible and apparent" condition that the subject door was missing a doorstop, posing a foreseeable risk that the door could slam a person's hand into the wall (Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66, 83 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).THIS… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Is anyone on that list bothering your house? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Is anyone on that list bothering your house? [read post]
