Search for: "I V"
Results 1 - 20
of 151,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:18 am
” “I agree with you, I agree with you,” he responded. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm
“I’m Native American,” Smith said, “Our community has experienced genocide, so I want to support Palestine that way, it resonates deeply with me. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:39 pm
This ruling, which affirmed the Court of Appeal ruling in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
A copy of the Court’s June 10, 2024, order in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am
I nearly burst out laughing when she cited favorably the precedent of Lochner v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
In Maxell, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
In Ioengine, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
I, § 24. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:27 am
Here is the opinion in Caremark LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
In Kauders v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:57 am
Biden and Murthy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
For example, in Watts v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
Last month, I had the opportunity and privilege to speak at the EUIPO Case Law Conference 2024 and present the challenges of trademark modernization, under the heading “Reconciling the Old with the New: Challenges of Trade Mark Modernization” [see IPKat here].In this post, I would like to discuss the main conclusion that I reached after reviewing case law of the EUIPO issued over the period 2022 – 2023. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Michael Showalter has posted Palmer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
But I expect this isn’t over. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
That said, a plaintiff may recover treble damages if the defendant “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487 [1]; see Hansen v Caffry, 280 AD2d 704, 705 [3d Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 603 [2001]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Iron Balls International Ltd. v. [read post]