Search for: "IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE (Per Curiam Order)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
—, 144 S.Ct. 717 (March 15, 2024)(per curiam), the Supreme Court grappled with whether exercising such custodial control constituted “state action” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
In re Core Communications, Inc., 531 F.3d 849, 862 (D.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
On the second question set out in the per curiam order, concerning legislative fact-finding, Rowley argued for an expansive protection for informal legislative fact-finding based on “important separation of powers issues. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The court ruled per curiam that the OTF board replacements were invalid and warned that, absent an injunction, the “OTF faces an increasing risk that its decision-making will be taken over by the government, that it will suffer reputational harm, and that it will lose the ability to effectively operate. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Congress' investigative committees would be unable to turn to courts to enforce orders against the President and his people. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:30 pm
A federal district judge ruled that the prosecution violated the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Alan is the past Chair of the Michigan Real Property Section Condemnation Law Committee, American Bar Association Real Property Section Condemnation Committee. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Mar. 6, 2015) THE COMPANION CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT (resolved with per curiam opinions issued the same day) THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In an initial order, the district court ruled that HHS's decision was unlawful, granted summary judgment to the Tribe, and directed the parties to prepare a proposed order for injunctive relief. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
The original orders, In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1995 WL 273600, at *2-3 (E.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
While the court has ordered entry of a permanent injunction against proponents, that permanent injunction does not require proponents to refrain from anything, as they are not (and cannot be) responsible for the application or regulation of California marriage law. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
PER CURIAM Appellant Patricia A. [read post]
