Search for: "IN RE: NEILL "
Results 1 - 20
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Against these bleak developments, however, options to re-claim some abortion access post-Dobbs are rising. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:33 am
” According to O’Neill, the PPS identified three main issues which would preclude successful prosecution. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
You think you're f***ing bad? [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:57 am
The City Council, in a meeting that spanned more than three hours for this one item and resulted in community members being removed from the council chambers, decided on Wednesday, April 10 to let the club re-sign its lease for one year. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” In re Marriage of O’Neill, 563 NE 2d 494 – Ill: Supreme Court 1990 A hedge fund partner who is happy to “cut his nose off to spite his face” by not earning carried interest will still be liable for dissipation of marital assets. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:00 am
ABA Section on Taxation, Women in Tax Forum Zoom Tea: Colleen O'Neill (registration): You're invited to join the next Women in Tax Forum Zoom Tea on Tuesday, March 26 at 3:00 pm ET. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Lawmakers Can’t Take Lobbyist Donations – Unless They’re Running for Congress MSN – Julia Wick, Anabel Sosa, and Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 2/24/2024 State law forbids California lobbyists from donating to the campaigns of state lawmakers. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
Justice Aylen has some scathing findings re other aspects of AC’s submissions: [192] While this is sufficient to dispose of Access Copyright’s meritless assertion that participating in the tariff-setting process at all levels (before the Board, this Court, and the Federal Court of Appeal) constituted an offer to pay, the rationale for why the Plaintiffs would have participated sheds further light on the absurdity of Access Copyright’s assertion. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:26 am
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in The George Washington Law Review, Carla L. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
In re Abbott, 954 f.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2020), vacated, 141 S. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:17 am
I also dislike the term “generative AI” because we’re not really generating anything, we’re merely dealing with logical inputs and outputs. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
“BARK IF YOU’RE DIRTY” ENABLED ASSAULT AND SEXUAL HARASSMENTIn late September, the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
”Would you say Res-Care took on some high risks there? [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Importantly, “vindication is an aspect of the award so that if the allegations should re-emerge, the damages must be large enough to proclaim the baselessness of the libel” [7]. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
MacDonald lmacdonald@mccarthy.ca Allison Spiegel aspiegel@mccarthy.ca RE: THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA ET AL v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:13 pm
Blaine, Thomas Reed, Joseph Cannon, Champ Clark, Sam Rayburn, Joseph Martin, John McCormack, Tip O’Neill, and Newt Gingrich. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:44 pm
We're going to create the place where people want to come back and have their businesses, so maybe they'll come back, because we'd like them back. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
You’re in Growing Company. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm
In re Brian David O’Neill. [read post]
