Search for: "IN RE ANTHONY E." Results 1 - 20 of 588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Jordan Blair Woods, a professor at the University of Arizona James E. [read post]
” Because the state statute altering the selection process for the board members was valid on its face—Disney conceded that absent a retaliatory motive the state could adopt the change in governance structure that it did—Disney could not prevail on a claim that the legislature had enacted the statute to retaliate against Disney for its speech.In support of this “settled law,” Judge Windsor invoked a 2015 case from the Eleventh Circuit (in which the district court sits),… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
O’Connor ran for the seat in her own right in 1970; she won and was re-elected again in 1972. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Efforts like the Ethics Guide for Trustworthy AI assume the regulatory role of Miss Millie.[8]   Jan Broekman takes us to the edge of that gap between the human, and their technologies of re-production and memory, their elaborate systems of subjectivity that has moved humanity to the construction of virtual imaginaries of itself. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by jonathanturley
Castro will then “sidelin[e] and neutraliz[e] the influence of conservative judges” by “nonsuit[ing] those cases” that are not assigned to “Obama-appointed or Clinton appointed judges. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
It provides a basis for re-thinking the fundamentals of the way in which one understands the interface between humanity and its increasingly autonomous technology, and between the idea of humanity as innate in itself against the reality that the human may now be more intensely manifested in its interfacing with increasingly self-generative machine intelligence and the hardware within which it resides. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Indiana (1973) the Court held that because Hess's statement "[w]e'll take the f—ing street later" or "[w]e'll take the f–ing street again" at an antiwar demonstration was not directed to any person, it could not be incitement and was protected speech. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Administrator
Cependant, avec égards, il a erré quant au caractère déterminant de cette preuve, un résultat irréconciliable avec sa propre conclusion sur la portée des expertises examinées. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
As one official put it, "removing bad information" is "one of the easy, low-bar things you guys [can] do to make people like me"—that is, White House officials—"think you're taking action. [read post]
Anthony Reynolds: While we’re certainly seeing some cooling in hiring for a few sectors, I remain optimistic that hiring overall is robust. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am by Eugene Volokh
As one official put it, "removing bad information" is "one of the easy, low-bar things you guys [can] do to make people like me"—that is, White House officials—"think you're taking action. [read post]