Search for: "IN RE G G WILLIAMS MINOR"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the Aging Senate, 80-Somethings Seeking Re-Election Draw Little Criticism Yahoo News – Kayla Guo (New York Times) | Published: 5/17/2024 While President Biden tries to assuage voter concerns about his age in a presidential race that includes the two oldest men ever to seek the White House, a couple of miles away in the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
CFPB, Justice Kagan accused the majority of deploying an “anti-power-concentration principle” to declare the agency’s single-director structure unconstitutional.[2] She then quipped, without citation, that “[i]f you’ve never heard of a statute being struck down on that ground, you’re not alone. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Jeff G. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Again, we have come to bury Cuba's Caribbean Marxism, not to praise it (William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act III, scene II). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In In re Solera Holdings, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Then there are non-RULLCA states such as Delaware that regularly re-visit and update their business entity laws, while our New York legislators seemingly pay no attention. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Minority—the MQD as a “weak” clear statement rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
A minority of Pennsylvania's convention authored a report in which they contended that citizens have a right to bear arms "unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
A minority of Pennsylvania's convention authored a report in which they contended that citizens have a right to bear arms "unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm
William R. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm
In 2020, in the In re: Robinhood Outage Litigation, the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:25 pm
Schiltz, William M. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Now, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
A minority of courts have disqualified expert witnesses “even if no disclosures occur,” in the name of the judicial process integrity.[5] Public Policy Limits on Wang Although the Wang test is sometimes characterized as a “bright-line” test, the Wang court itself was sensitive to potential abuse by lawyers who wished to silence certain expert witnesses by creating what appears to be a confidential relationship without actually sharing confidential information. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
According to the case law of the Enlarged Board, a point of law is of fundamental importance if the answer to it goes beyond the individual case at issue and will be relevant in a potentially large number of cases (G 1/12, Reasons, point 11).2.1 In the Board's view it appears self-evident that the point of law addressed in the question below is of fundamental importance for an indefinite number of cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
THOMAS G. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 5:24 pm
These remarks are quite telling for a nation embedded in cultures that values the therapeutic ("In 1909 when Sigmunf Freud, Carl Jung, William James, G. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
”) Surely, no one is contending that all persons, whether citizens or not, whether natural persons or non-natural persons like corporations, whether minors or most pertinently whether they hold or have ever held or are even eligible to hold office, are subject to impeachment and conviction for the offenses that might lead to the removal of a civil officer. [read post]
