Search for: "IN RE G.S." Results 1 - 20 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 7:34 am by Alex Phipps
The Court pointed to G.S. 15A-1443 for the appropriate prejudicial error tests. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
Yep, it's four times more likely that they're correlated. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am by Jacquelyn Greene
In re Rikard, 161 N.C.App. 150 (2003),  In re J.F., 237 N.C.App. 218 (2014), In re D.A.H., 277 N.C.App. 16 (2021). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am by Alex Phipps
The trial court denied this petition, relying on In re Borden, 216 N.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am by Phil Dixon
., G.S. 20-139.1 (c1) (analysis of blood or urine in an implied consent case); G.S. 90-95(g) (drug analysis reports); G.S. 8-58.20 (any lab report). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
We’re gearing up to do that—if you’re interested, let us know. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:04 am by Alex Phipps
When the victim answered, defendant told her “[i]f you’re still in Asheville, I’m gonna try and send you some money,” and “I got $1,000 for ya. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm by Jacquelyn Greene
The Bulletin describes these cases, culminating with In re D.L.D, 203 N.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
Requiring much longer periods of enrollment may (re)implicate those concerns. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am by Phil Dixon
Compare the challenged South Carolina laws to North Carolina’s G.S. 14-288.4(6). [read post]