Search for: "IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 27"
Results 1 - 20
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
The New York Times reported that Chesebro’s memos later formed part of the Trump lawyers’ efforts: “The memos were initially meant to address Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Initially, there were eight objections upon the giving of public notice. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
On March 27 at 10:30 am, the morning after the gag order was entered, Trump mentioned Justice Merchan’s daughter in a post on Truth Social in which he criticized the gag order, saying she was “allowed to post pictures of her ‘dream’ of putting me in jail. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Terraform also filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protections on January 21. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
Appellate courts have acknowledged the right to appeal a dispositional order entered after a motion for review on a probation violation (In re E.M., 263 N.C.App. 476 (2019), In re K.N.H., 278 N.C.App. 27 (2021)) and a dispositional order entered following a motion for review and extension of probation supervision (In re H.D.H., 269 N.C.App. 409 (2020)). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Lawmakers Can’t Take Lobbyist Donations – Unless They’re Running for Congress MSN – Julia Wick, Anabel Sosa, and Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 2/24/2024 State law forbids California lobbyists from donating to the campaigns of state lawmakers. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:53 pm
The (re)election approaches, and no dissent – not even in its smallest form – is tolerated. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
W.C.A.B. (2nd—B331989) Petitions for Writ of Review—Untimely Petitions—Court of Appeal dismissed applicant’s Petition for Writ of Review as untimely, when applicant failed… Appeals Board Panel Decisions Bradford (Eiren) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Instead, Chase was adjudicating a habeas petition from a defendant sentenced by Judge Sheffey who was asking to have Sheffey’s actions declared invalid on grounds that the judge was acting ultra vires due to his Se [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
As we dive into the new year, we're filled with gratitude, excitement and unwavering determination. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
We’re on the cusp of [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
Re St Mary, Great Chart [2022] ECC Can, Re Christ Church, Harwood [2002] 1 WLR 2055, and Re St. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc., 2023 VT 65. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As an initial matter, the First Amendment generally presents no barrier to antidiscrimination rules applied to common carriers like telephone companies, railroads, and postal services.[5] Even outside the context of common carriers, the First Amendment does not operate as a complete bar to all regulations. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
The trial court denied this petition, relying on In re Borden, 216 N.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
In total, the petition was considered at eight conferences. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
-initiated draft resolution that would have strengthened sanctions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), arguing in the negotiations that the resolution would adversely affect the humanitarian situation there and would not help to resolve tensions on the Korean peninsula. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The Church Buildings Council also initially raised concerns, but was content to defer to the DAC which recommended the petition [4]. [read post]
