Search for: "IN RE JUNIPER NETWORKS" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Chopra’s comments Thursday came as the Credit Card Competition Act, which is aimed at reducing merchant card-acceptance fees by requiring network choice, has been re-introduced in Congress. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Jason Rantanen
Similarly, in granting mandamus in In re Juniper Networks—a precedential decision—the Federal Circuit cited its prior nonprecedential opinion in In re Hulu five times, concluding that “this case is a very close cousin of our recent decisions in Samsung [precedential] and Hulu [nonprecedential], and the disposition of this case is largely dictated by the disposition of those cases. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:55 am by Zak Gowen
These options, offered by major card networks like Visa and Mastercard, rely on tokenized cards on file to back up authorizations for payments. . . . [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by David Lynn
” Ben Backberg from General Mills, Dorothy Flynn from Broadridge, Carl Hagberg from The Shareholder Service Optimizer, Mary Catherine Malley from Juniper Networks and Vernicka Shaw from Capital One discussed the latest developments to consider for annual meetings. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
If you’re not yet a member, subscribe now by emailing sales@ccrcorp.com – or call us at 800.737.1271. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Jason Rantanen
  As the Federal Circuit explained in In re: Juniper Networks: [WSOU]’s presence in Waco appears to be both recent and relatively insubstantial. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:47 am by Dennis Crouch
 (proper but inconvenient forum); 22-106 In re: Juniper Networks, Inc. [read post]
For example, concerning the most important factor, the relative convenience of the transferee forum for the potential witnesses, Juniper identified 11 witness located in the Northern District of California, while the plaintiff—a company’s whose presence in Texas appeared to be both recent and ephemeral—identified only one witness (In re Juniper Networks, Inc., September 24, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
For example, concerning the most important factor, the relative convenience of the transferee forum for the potential witnesses, Juniper identified 11 witness located in the Northern District of California, while the plaintiff—a company’s whose presence in Texas appeared to be both recent and ephemeral—identified only one witness (In re Juniper Networks, Inc., September 24, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm by Jason Rantanen
  That streak has come to an end, as today the court issued In re: Juniper Networks. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am by Florian Mueller
"Juniper:"Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware that maintains an established place of business at 1120 S Capital of Texas Hwy #120, Austin, TX. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
My slides.This is going to be an opinionated overview; I know you’re an expert audience and I’m going to try to highlight developments you may have heard less about or at least spent less time thinking about. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:32 pm by Unknown
  Also, here is a blurb from a release by the LOT Network: "When you’re caught up in the day-to-day business of moving things forward, it’s easy to lose sight of accomplishments. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:30 am by Andrew Crocker
” That might seem painfully obvious—a flaw or backdoor in a Juniper router is dangerous for anyone running a network, whether that network is in the U.S. or Iran. [read post]