Search for: "IN RE MEDIATEK"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2022, 2:11 am
And now that we're appproaching the end of the year, there isn't even room for debate: the Avanci model (through which Sisvel actually licenses its own patents to car makers) has been universally accepted. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Merpel wonders where we are headed on the FRAND licensing level debate, and who is in the driver's seat? [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am
Even prior to the FTC formally giving up on that part, I had acknowledged that Qualcomm had credibly claimed never to have intended to grant exhaustive chipset-level licenses.This is an important landmark case, so I will spend some time in the weeks ahead re-reading the key documents and researching some of the theories in order to develop an opinion ahead of the hearing on what the outcome will be. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:13 pm
In Re: Qualcomm litigation Case No. 3:17cv0108-GPC-MDD (S.D. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am
While Taylor Swift sounds and has very different IP ownership to Black Sabbath, CD production of their respective albums is as oblivious and independent of that as is TSMC’s chip foundry to the cellular or video codec SEP ownership and to the implementation of cellular modem designs by MediaTek versus Huawei’s HiSilicon. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
Huawei and MediaTek could have complained, but Korean observers believe they aren't interested in that particular jurisdiction to the extent they'd take action there. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
We're not even talking about the Supreme Court deciding to overrule an earlier decision. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 2:07 am
Imagine you're a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and from time to time you serve on the Motions Panel that changes every month. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Meanwhile, chipmaker MediaTek has also made a filing in support of the FTC's position. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
But there's a wealth of evidence in the record, such as testimony by Intel and MediaTek, as to the anticompetitive effects of Qualcomm's rivals being unable to sell a licensed product to customers (and unable to control the effective bottom-line cost their customers incur). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The appeal will take time, but we're talking about roughly a year. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
According to the motion, "[t]he witnesses who testified at these hearings included representatives from Samsung, Intel, Motorola, MediaTek and Huawei, among other companies. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:05 am
By beating Qualcomm at the game where its vast resources could have given it an advantage (expert testimony), after thrashing it with respect to industry testimony, the FTC's litigators have reached the point at which I guess we're going to see ever more Apple- and Huawei-related conspiracy theories between now and Judge Koh's opinion, all of which is to no avail as long as Qualcomm can't get a third commissioner to support some fake settlement based on… [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 10:36 am
When I just said "interesting," I primarily meant that it satisfies our curiosity as to what happened behind the scenes years ago and ultimately led to the mess we're learning more and more about. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:59 am
MediaTek tried to, but wasn't nearly as effective during the public part of the testimony. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:43 am
As far as Huawei is concerned, they're actually not just a licensee, but also a rather aggressive licensor as their dispute with Samsung (pending in the same district) shows. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
Thus, other chipmakers—including Intel, MediaTek, Samsung, and others—have been free to make and sell modem chips, do so in increasing volumes, and pay no royalties to Qualcomm. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
If you're interested in real-time information on this trial, please don't forget to follow me on Twitter.About a month ago, the parties filed their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which already constituted a preview of what we're going to see and, especially, hear this month. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:48 am
Instead, Apple would use Intel and MediaTek components according to the report.Nothing is final yet, and Qualcomm says it could and would still sell its products to Apple. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am
Apple is now embroiled in a particularly intense and escalating fight with Qualcomm, and there may be reasons for which they're particularly proactive, though Samsung isn't just sitting by idly. [read post]
