Search for: "IN RE OPINION NO. 26 OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Apparently such one-judge disbarment orders are generally authorized under Connecticut law, though my sense is that they are unauthorized or at least uncommon in many other states. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
Supr., No. 1, 2022 (Dec. 19, 2022), the majority of Delaware’s High Court determined, without reconsidering the finding by the Court of Chancery that one of the formal legal opinion letters involved was not done in good faith, that:  (1) the proper decision maker accepted the opinion of counsel of one of the law firms involved to exercise a call right, contrary to the Chancery opinion; and (2) that party relied in good faith on the formal… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The court was asked to consider the overarching limits of the three-step test (Article 5(5) of the InfoSoc Directive); how far can an unauthorized quotation, criticism, or review go? [read post]
Finally, the appellate court held that when apportioning water in an overdrafted basin among correlative rights holders, a court may employ equitable apportionment principles to the extent necessary to reach a practical apportionment of the available water among parties holding equivalent priorities. [read post]
Finally, the appellate court held that when apportioning water in an overdrafted basin among correlative rights holders, a court may employ equitable apportionment principles to the extent necessary to reach a practical apportionment of the available water among parties holding equivalent priorities. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The practice has been criticized as deceptive and predatory. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
Wednesday, February 26, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the Defense Department's fiscal year 2021 budget request. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Alan is the past Chair of the Michigan Real Property Section Condemnation Law Committee, American Bar Association Real Property Section Condemnation Committee. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
 Practically, the process never worked with 100% efficiency. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Moreover, as we have indicated in our meetings, we are reminded of our duty to protect the President and his Office.Thus, in deciding whether to advise the President to be interviewed, we are guided by the controlling law in thisCircuit, In re Sealed Case (Espy), 121 F.3d 729 (D.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Geist now opposes the Fairplay proposal asserting that piracy is not a concern because Canada is “well below global averages when it comes to things like downloading music from unauthorized sites, stream ripping so-called from sites like YouTube. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Oregon: State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
CanLII can be upgraded to fund the institute by providing legal research and opinion services at cost. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am by Robert Chesney
When that topic comes up, inevitably there follows at least a brief reference to the Church Committee's exposure of Operation SHAMROCK and Operation MINARET. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  While opinions vary, everyone seems to agree that corporate boards need to bring a greater sense of urgency to address the growing business risk of cyber-attacks. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]