Search for: "IN RE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nondisclosure agreements (NDA) are legally binding contracts that prevent information-sharing with unauthorized parties. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Charles Littlejohn pleaded guilty last year to one count of unauthorized disclosure of income tax returns. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:56 am by Bob Ambrogi
Shely is the 2020-2023 chair of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility and a member of the Arizona Supreme Court’s Alternative Business Structure Committee. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by James Petrila
Subsequent congressional investigations by the Church and Pike committees, however, revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) had engaged in substantial unauthorized warrantless collection directed at U.S. persons in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
DELAWARE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS Supreme Court Reverses Chancery and Finds that LP Manager Reasonably Relied in Good Faith on Opinion Letter           The Delaware Supreme Court recently reversed a decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery, highlighted on these pages, that addressed whether the general partner of a limited partnership relied in good faith on the formal… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The court was asked to consider the overarching limits of the three-step test (Article 5(5) of the InfoSoc Directive); how far can an unauthorized quotation, criticism, or review go? [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seeking to test the constitutionality of the law, Cruz lent $260,000 to his 2018 re-election campaign. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. [read post]
   In the access-to-justice area, the goal of a sandbox is to loosen the usual prohibitions on law practice—think bans on unauthorized practice of law and on non-lawyer ownership and financing of law firms—in order to see what types of new legal services delivery models might emerge and then evaluate their potential to increase access and decrease costs, all while protecting consumer welfare. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm by Stacie Rosenzweig
Two Supreme Court Rules are implicated here—SCR 20:5.1 (responsibilities of partners, managers, and supervisory lawyers) and SCR 20:5.3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistance). [read post]
Finally, the appellate court held that when apportioning water in an overdrafted basin among correlative rights holders, a court may employ equitable apportionment principles to the extent necessary to reach a practical apportionment of the available water among parties holding equivalent priorities. [read post]
Finally, the appellate court held that when apportioning water in an overdrafted basin among correlative rights holders, a court may employ equitable apportionment principles to the extent necessary to reach a practical apportionment of the available water among parties holding equivalent priorities. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The practice has been criticized as deceptive and predatory. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am by Robert J. Reinstein
The House has consistently taken that position and the Supreme Court endorsed it in In re Chapman, one of its two cases that discuss expulsion. [read post]