Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
[B.] [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm
Netflix rejected a strict-liability claim against Netflix arising from a child who committed suicide after watching the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why, in which teen suicide plays a prominent role in the plot. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 2:10 pm
UVARI, No. 2: 18-cr-00253-APG-NJK (D. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:07 am
After segregating minors, the services must then block minors from accessing content that “promotes, glorifies, or facilitates” the following content categories: (A) “suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders”; (B) “substance abuse”; (C) “stalking, bullying, or harassment”; (D) “grooming, trafficking, child pornography, or other sexual exploitation or abuse”; and (E) material that qualifies as obscenity for minors… [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 12:20 am
The installation of the prayer bowl and the removal of the altar would be permitted for 5 years from this date; b). [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
While the Court’s procedural due process jurisprudence precludes adjudicators from having an institutional financial interest in determinations such adjudicators make, e.g., Ward v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 7:18 am
The Special Rapporteur recommends that multilateral development banks:(a) Conduct ex ante assessment of the impacts of project finance on thehuman rights of children and future generations and include suitable clauses in theircontracts to prevent, mitigate and remediate such impacts;(b) Provide grants and increase long-term, low-interest financing for childdevelopment, especially to States under debt distress;(c) Ensure that their grievance mechanisms are child-responsive… [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 1:19 pm
The Chargé d’Affaires of Iraq’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations Dr. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:21 pm
Code § 63-9-780(C)[ii] gave it blanket protection in civil discovery against having to disclose anything in its files concerning an adopted child. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 4:19 pm
Since political influence is a zero-sum game, giving more votes to Group A necessarily reduces the proportional electoral weight of B, C, and D. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Maximize Child-Related Tax Benefits Understanding the IRS guidelines on claiming head of household status (IRC § 2(b)), child tax credit (IRC § 24), and the earned income credit (IRC § 32) is crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Maximize Child-Related Tax Benefits Understanding the IRS guidelines on claiming head of household status (IRC § 2(b)), child tax credit (IRC § 24), and the earned income credit (IRC § 32) is crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Maximize Child-Related Tax Benefits Understanding the IRS guidelines on claiming head of household status (IRC § 2(b)), child tax credit (IRC § 24), and the earned income credit (IRC § 32) is crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
Introduction Palestine is a litmus test and, as I wrote in a recent article in the International Journal of Transnational Justice, is unearthing “who has historically been entitled to levy the charge of genocide, which genocides have been cognizable, and which have been unremembered. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
§ 9003(e)(2)(B). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
In addition, the order also combines the CCPA and COPPA definitions of “collect,” but expands the definition from “minors” to “consumers”: Collects or collection means the gathering of any personal information from a consumer by any means, including without limitation, (a) requesting, prompting, or encouraging a child to submit personal information online; (b) enabling a consumer to make personal information publicly available in… [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
§ 626(d)(1)) Intellectual property: Patent infringement: 6 years (35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
§ 626(d)(1)) Intellectual property: Patent infringement: 6 years (35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
§ 626(d)(1)) Intellectual property: Patent infringement: 6 years (35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am
California (1973): "the [a] average person, [b] applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, [c] taken as a whole, [d] appeals to the prurient interest," "the work depicts or describes, [a] in a patently offensive way [under [b] contemporary community standards, Smith v. [read post]
