Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 1 - 20 of 272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
Boiled down, all the statutory presumption says is that some (unspecified) involvement is in a child’s best interests (unless it’s not). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm by Mark Ashton
Judge Bowes, in dissent, asserts there is standing under Section 5324(3)(iii)(B) because, in her judgment, the father of this child has neglected the child by taking no positive steps to parent during the first 13 years of his eldest child’s life. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
Acts present in each part or the second of this article, committed: b) using mass media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet; shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of two to six years, with or without deprivation of liberty for a term of up to fifteen years. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
This case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding child custody and the importance of balancing the interests of all parties involved while at the same time making sure that the best interests of the child are given priority. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
  He sought inferences to be drawn that the wife had transferred funds into her late mother’s property and had acquired an interest in that property either by her investment or by inheritance. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
MacNaughton J. found that relitigating issues that were determined after a lengthy civil trial did not further the children’s interests and that JTP could cross-examine KS, make submissions, and lead evidence about any of the factors concerning the best interests of the children since the release of the Merits Decision, but could not challenge the civil judge’s factual findings regarding the assault, which he plead guilty to in criminal court. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Jan von Hein
Does the term “contract for the provision of services” in Art 4(1)(b) Rome I Regulation include a building cont [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In the Court of Protection, Cohen J decided that it was in RS’s best interests to receive palliative care only rather than life-sustaining treatment. (30 December 2020). [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Despite Brandi's put-offs, Arbogast testified that he thought he could persuade Brandi and so continued to play along, indicating interest in the children only to get on the mother's good side. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am by Mayela Celis
But they must be adequate and effective and should not be adopted just for the sake of adopting them without any teeth, as this would not be in the best interests of the child (in concreto). [read post]