Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF R. SCOTT CUNNINGHAM"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2023, 6:42 am
“I think (generative AI) is useful for lawyers as long as they’re using it properly, obviously, and as long as they realize that ChatGPT is not a legal research tool,” said Judge Scott U. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
William R. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Scott R. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
SCOTT SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.P.O. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
SCOTT SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.P.O. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Koritsanszky, Rebecca Cunningham, Francine L. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
Contracts in the Real World: Stories of Popular Contracts and Why They Matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
(Congratulations to Stephen R. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160) bikini (18)… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
K 1401 C38 2012 Intellectual property : a global directory of acronyms and abbreviations Jon R. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:51 am
Elections matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
**Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Cunningham Henry St. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
It matters little whether the incidence of sex crimes is low; the public reacts to the danger they perceive. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 5:54 pm
The dissent by Justice Cunningham, joined by Justices Schroeder and Scott, agrees that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction and agreed that the appropriate standard was "best interest" rather than serious endangerment. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:52 am
Justices Cunningham and Scott concurred in the result only, and each wrote separate opinions in which the other joined. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:44 pm
Two concurring Justices, Scott and Cunningham, believe that the biological father's status as a "stranger to the marriage" is the fundamental reason for the legislative language and there is no Constitutional right of a "stranger to the marriage" to assert paternity. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Viva R. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Viva R. [read post]
