Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF FORTH" Results 1 - 20 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 6:08 am by Andrew Koppelman
The decision quickly called forth charges of censorship. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Peter Rawlings
” The court’s analysis drew on the discovery limitations set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
”[4] The FCC also reinstated the classification of mobile BIAS as a commercial mobile service (i.e., within the scope of Title II), pursuant to Section 332(d)(1) of the Communications Act.[5] BIAS does not include enterprise services,[6] and does not include private end-user networks, coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and other businesses that acquire BIAS to provide service to patrons.[7] The Order also described a category of “non-BIAS services,” defined as… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 10:53 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Remember, the outcome of any legal matter depends on the specific facts and circumstances involved. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:37 am by Sehreen Ladak and Joshua Fox
The NLRB ordered the employer to, among other things, (1) cease and desist from prohibiting employees from taking part in “protected concerted activities,” such as displaying “Black Lives Matter” insignia on their uniform aprons; (2) reinstate the employee without prejudice and compensate him for lost back pay and any adverse tax consequences; and (3) post notice of the decision for 60 days at the store where the dispute arose. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Garland , a 2023 decision, despite the fact that the Biden administration had already, through Garland’s decision, reinstated the prior rule under Matter of Avetisyan , which permitted IJs and the BIA to administratively close removal proceedings, even if a party opposes. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Saville was later reinstated but claims her employer retaliated against her by treating her unfairly and defaming her, among other things. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am by Alex Phipps
When the matter came to district court, defendant moved to suppress the results of the stop. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
  The plan settled the matter by repaying the funds, along with additional civil penalties.[7] In light of these incidents and other violations, Congress took action and passed the “Federal Employees Health Benefits Amendments Act of 1988. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
The reform recommendations set forth below are designed to spark a dialogue on FTC policy changes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
  Factual Background In this matter, the employer Quickway Transportation, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Emergence of the ‘Neo-Brandeisians’ Thus, matters unfolded until the curtain began to descend on the second Obama term in 2016. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The court allowed Griffin's First Amendment case to go forward, to the extent that it sought reinstatement rather than damages (which were barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity and qualified immunity): Griffin asserts that she engaged in protected speech when she made her requests to the Dean seeking data supporting the University's COVID-19 policies, and that she was speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 12:08 pm by Berniard Law Firm
The outcomes of races matter a lot to those involved, and debates about those races can be pretty contentious, even getting to court. [read post]