Search for: "ITC 337 Law Blog" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 3:23 am
The ITC 337 Law Blog features discussion and commentary on Section 337 hearings before the International Trade Commission, as a forum for sharing information relating to this unique type of litigation. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:23 am
The ITC 337 Law Blog features discussion and commentary on Section 337 hearings before the International Trade Commission, as a forum for sharing information relating to this unique type of litigation. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:30 am
regular readers know that I love niche blogs, and you can't get much "nichier" than to have a blog focused on one particular section of the law. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by John Steele
From ITC 337 Law Blog, here's news of the disqualification of Apple's counsel. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:30 am by Ken Lopez
Jim Adduci, an experienced ITC practitioner and managing partner of well-known D.C. international trade law firm Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg LLP, says, “At the ITC under Section 337, it’s due process with dispatch. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:13 pm
Check out their ITC 337 Law Blog, authored by the firm's ITC practice co-chairs, Thomas Fisher and Barry Herman, along with senior associate Eric Schweibenz. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:15 pm
    Dave spoke recently to ITC 337 Law Blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm by Sherica Celine
The Practical Guidance and Law 360 Podcasts Resource Kit features interviews with industry-leading attorneys on cutting edge issues in the law: NFTs, Cannabis, COVID-19, and more. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 5:12 am by Simon Lester
From the ITC 337 Law Blog: On December 29, 2009, Nokia Corporation of Finland and Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:56 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
  Topics include:Evaluating Where to Litigate International IP DisputesPositioning Complainants, Respondents and Intervenors in Section 337 CasesSuccessfully Working the Logistics of Section 337 LitigationCoordinating Related Parties & Proceedings Managing Litigation through Discovery, Claim Construction, Summary Determination and TrialMeeting the Challenge of the ITC’s Unique Trial ProceduresSeeking Commission Review and Modification of ALJ… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Sherica Celine
ITC Section 337 Investigations in Patent Infringement: Pre-suit Considerations Check out this guidance for patent owners who are considering the ITC as a forum. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
A document just appeared on the public docket of ITC investigation no. 337-TA-1299 that shows the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII; commonly referred to as "the ITC staff") concurs with Ericsson, and conversely disagrees with Apple, on several disputed claim terms:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22060656-22-06-14-itc-1299-joined-claim-construction-chart-ericsson-apple-itc-staffAdministrative Law Judge (ALJ) David P. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by ITC 337 Law Blog
ITC 337 Law Blog salutes the accomplishments of former Chief Administrative Law Judge Luckern. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:41 pm by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Victory for Apple: ITC bans infringing HTC phones starting in April (Ars Technica) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Ars Technica) (FOSS Patents) (Patently-O) (FOSS Patents) 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirms DMCA [...] [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
”[10] After the complaint is filed, the typical schedule for a Section 337 investigation is as follows: The ITC will typically decide whether to institute an investigation within 30 days of the complaint being filed;[11] If instituted, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) will oversee the investigation, which includes discovery, a hearing, and an initial determination, and then the ITC (a different set of people from the ALJ) will issue a final… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  As discussed on the Patents Post-Grant Blog, in view of these significant differences, it is possible that the ITC will eventually start to grant motions to stay Section 337 actions pending resolution of the new post-grant proceedings much more readily than it has in the past with traditional reexaminations. [read post]