Search for: "ITS Products, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 30,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs claim Facebook “affirmatively invites” scammy ads by “actively soliciting, encouraging, and assisting scammers it knows, or should know, are using its platform to defraud Facebook users with deceptive ads,” all to goose its profits. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:28 am by Bill Marler
“It is incomprehensible that Family Dollar knew about the rodent and pest issues at its distribution center in Arkansas but continued to ship products that were unsafe and insanitary. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Reyes Farm & Associates Inc. of RIO GRANDE, PR, entered into a Civil Penalty Stipulation Agreement under which it agreed to pay a stipulated civil penalty of $2,260 for violations of the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) Keeley Food Service Inc. of Chicago, IL, entered into a Civil Penalty Stipulation Agreement under which it agreed to pay a stipulated civil penalty of $1,325 for violations of the EPIA. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2024, Master Dagnall handed down judgment in Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) in relation to an article (“the Article”) first published on 22 May 2021 by Journalism Development Network Inc and written by Mr Daniel Balint-Kurti and Mr William Jordan (“the Defendants”). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Supervalu Inc., 2024 WL 2803030, No. 22 Civ. 10262 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Sadie Mayhew
In a recent legal development, spinal device manufacturer Innovasis Inc. along with two of its top executives, Brent Felix and Garth Felix, have agreed to pay $12 million to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, you have a better sense than we do of how your client maintains documents, what its internal processes are, and who may have relevant evidence. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 7:48 am by David Adelstein
In Appeal of Centex Bateson Construction, Co., Inc., 9901 BCA P 30153, VABCA 4613 (VABCA 1998), the Board explained: Direct impact, as the immediate and direct effect of a change on unchanged work, is considered foreseeable. *** Direct impact is generally characterized as the immediate and direct disruption resulting from a change that lowers productivity in the performance of the changed or unchanged work. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Coral Beach
The company has also asked its direct customers to notify their customers of this recall. [read post]