Search for: "In Re American Commercial Lines, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 6:15 am
Reza Barazesh head of North American research for Equifax's Commercial Information Solutions division. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:49 am
In re American Cruise Lines, Inc., Serial No. 87040022 (October 3, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
In re Nielsen Business Media, Inc., 93 USPQ2d 1545 (TTAB 2010) [precedential].In response to a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of its intent-to-use application, Applicant claimed that the mark THE BOLLYWOOD REPORTER had acquired distinctiveness and was therefore registrable under Section 2(f). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 8:06 am
In the case of In re Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
RE/MAX FIRST CHOICE, LLC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
" Hadeed had met the statutory standard, the court held, because "the statements [we]re tortious if not made by customers" and "the identity of the communicators [w]as essential to maintain a suit for defamation. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 5:33 am
American International Processing, L.L.C., Del. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Aruba Networks, Inc., C.A. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:19 pm
See In re WeWork Litigation, No. 2020-0258-AGB (Del. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
" Hadeed had met the statutory standard, the court held, because "the statements [we]re tortious if not made by customers" and "the identity of the communicators [w]as essential to maintain a suit for defamation. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
" Hadeed had met the statutory standard, the court held, because "the statements [we]re tortious if not made by customers" and "the identity of the communicators [w]as essential to maintain a suit for defamation. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:23 am
In re AHL, Inc., Serial No. 77741878 (September 30, 2010) [not precedential].Of course an Applicant may see to register any portion of a composite mark, provided the particular portion creates a separate and distinct commercial impression. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Inter American Convention for Trademark and Commercial Protection: Industria sought cancellation of the registration and priority in the US under the IAC, as well as an injunction against “unfair competition. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:13 am
Copyright © 2007-2017 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:48 pm
Treviso, 20th March 2007 Dear Sirs Re: Business Contracts from U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:21 pm
Leong Allstate v Bonn American Commercial v Water Qual Atmos Energy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Specialty Coatings, Inc., Opposition No. 91187787 [Opposition to ARMORSTONE for "clear and pigmented coatings used in the nature of paint; Glazes; House paint; Interior paint; Mixed paints; Paint for concrete floors; Paint primers; Paint sealers; Paint thinner; Paints; Paints and lacquers; Pavement striping paint; Epoxy coating for use on concrete industrial floors," on the grounds of mere descriptiveness and likelihood of confusion with various registered marks containing the… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
App. 1996); In re GlenFed, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:54 am
” The Board found the marks to be more dissimilar than similar, and it concluded that confusion is not likely.In re American Cruise Lines, Inc., 128 USPQ2d 1157 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 12:00 pm
And these companies exact further harms by serving as a roadblock to positive change: employing lobbying groups like the American Bail Coalition to spread fear-mongering misinformation, attempt to stymie reform, and to preserve their fiscal bottom line. [read post]
