Search for: "In Re Application of US for an Order" Results 1 - 20 of 15,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
In Order 1977 — the numbering of FERC orders seems completely random, in case you’re wondering — FERC made some important process changes. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:35 am by David Pocklington
” [30] Ms Humphreys went on to submit that on the unique facts of this case, namely that the original building was no longer used for worship, it would be disproportionate to make an order. [31] Her final submission was that the Chancellor could impose a time-limited permission for the works until such time as the church was used for public worship of the Church of England. [read post]
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
During my own visit to Kibbutz Be’eri and Kibbutz Kfar Aza, as well as to the site of Supernova Music Festival in Re’im, I saw the devastating scenes of these attacks and the profound impact of the unconscionable crimes charged in the applications filed today. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
  The co-perpetration allegation is based on Netanyahu and Gallant’s making essential contributions to a common plan to use starvation and other acts of violence against the Gazan civilian population as a means to eliminate Hamas and secure the return of hostages, as well as to inflict collective punishment. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
In order to answer that question, the court used a framework that the Second Circuit set forth in its 2020 decision in In Re Jackson (which I asked/begged courts to do). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  They seek a determination that respondent improperly failed to solicit bids; a determination that the cooperative bidding herein was obtained without State Education Department (SED) approval; an order directing the cessation of work on the project; and an order directing that respondent re-bid the project.Respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed as untimely, for lack of standing, and for failure to join a necessary party. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  They seek a determination that respondent improperly failed to solicit bids; a determination that the cooperative bidding herein was obtained without State Education Department (SED) approval; an order directing the cessation of work on the project; and an order directing that respondent re-bid the project.Respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed as untimely, for lack of standing, and for failure to join a necessary party. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Commission orders a censure, monetary penalties, and a suspension from appearing or practicing before the SEC for the audit partner. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:29 am by Yosi Yahoudai
”Labcorp plans to talk with physicians and maternal-fetal specialists about the components of the test, Caveney said, but he added that the screening test could still be ordered using the blood-based biomarkers and regular blood pressure readings. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:13 pm by Stephen Page
The clinic consented to the orders made that day and later confirmed in writing that they didn’t wish to be heard on the application and would abide with the orders of the court. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:13 pm by Stephen Page
The clinic consented to the orders made that day and later confirmed in writing that they didn’t wish to be heard on the application and would abide with the orders of the court. [read post]