Search for: "In Re Brady"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
Employees finally emerge as the room fills with pepper spray, where they're punched in the face, pushed off of crutches, and have fake bullets fired into their chest. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
(Brady MacDonald/Orange County Register/SCNG) That’s not the case with the Fiery Mustafarian in the Chandrilan Orb. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
As another sunset of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 authorities looms, the House of Representatives has passed a compromise bill, the “Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act,” H.R. 7888 (RISAA), which the Senate is now considering. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:06 am
Given the confluence of cases in which the Eastern District of North Carolina United States Attorney’s Office has breached its discovery standards, it appears a re-evaluation [of its discovery standards] is in order. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:36 am
Brady, 107 U.S. 192 (1883) (a “slight advance” of “ordinary mechanical or engineering skill” is not enough) The successful patent challengers (Teva and Apotex) recently filed their responsive brief–complying with a request from the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 1:25 am
“the Tetra Pak Heir”), and the Moors murderers (mainly Ian Brady) and the more recent note on cremation ashes. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
Please join us in Arlington, Va. to confer, commemorate, and kvetch with an all-star lineup of scholars, including Laura Donohue, Maureen Brady, Morgan Cloud, Daniel Epps, Luke Milligan, and James Stern. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:44 pm
If you’re not approved, try again. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
And here the parties--Glossip and the state of Oklahoma--are on the same side.Maybe you're thinking that this is one of those enforce-but-don't-defend cases? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
On April 28, 2023, the Honorable Mary Catherine Green, County Judge in Lakeland, FL, granted a motion to exclude our client’s breath test after we alleged the machine did not substantially comply with the administrative rules. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:30 am
At that meeting Gamboa gave his lawyer documents that showed the prosecution withheld Brady material (Fifth Circuit Motto: "We gonna fix that damn pesky Brady case") showing another man had committed the murders. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
At one moment they’re sleeping, then they’re fighting and snarling at each other like mortal enemies. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Mootness If you’re a fan of Munsingwear, you’re in luck, because it is also at the center of our second new relist. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Brady, 924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991) Holcomb v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:09 pm
The Brady Act of 1993 prohibits certain individuals from purchasing firearms, including individuals the VA determines mentally incompetent. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Maryland; and (2) whether suppressed impeachment evidence of the state’s key witness is per se non-material under Brady because that witness’ credibility had been otherwise impeached at trial. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Brownback, 22-912 Issue: Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judgment bar, which this court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Which is not to say they’re unimportant – just a lot less captivating than the brain candy that came before. [read post]
