Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 1 - 20
of 14,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
Justice Jackson thinks they’re infringing, and Hetronic relied on her concurrence to argue that these “goods [were] intended to be sold downstream” and that Abitron “took ... steps to facilitate downstream sales in the United States,” making those sales “sufficiently domestic” for Lanham Act purposes. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar pushed back, citing the Idaho law's text and an Idaho Supreme Court opinion. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Second, Egilman had already completed his report, and his request showed that his opinions had been asserted without looking at material documents. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
The OLC opinions Trump relies upon are far more equivocal and complicated than Trump implies. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
[Reasonable SWAT mistakes, lying forensic pathologists, and de minimis injuries. ] Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The justices’ constitutional and policy sympathies are likely to be engaged here, which means they’re more likely to stretch existing law to stop the rule. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
It was effectively a “Trust us, we’re the government” assurance. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Second, it is true that in 1995, the Office of Legal Counsel suggested in an opinion that the federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
“We’re writing a rule for the ages,” Justice Neil Gorsuch says. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh elicited laughs when he asked if he had to “buy anything you just said on net neutrality” in order to rule in favor of the social-media companies. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Justice Department’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division, and a former FTC general counsel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
Early in Lisa Blatt’s argument for Starbucks, Justice Sonia Sotomayor commented, “I do understand why that needs to be corrected because you’re right, it’s the court that has to decide the likelihood of [success] on the merits. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division. https://www.loc.gov/item/2017657589/ Decision The Supreme Court initially heard the case in December 1952, but the justices did not reach a decision by the end of the term and the case was re-argued in December 1953. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
In other words, five out of seven Justices seemingly share this opinion that there are “cases that would warrant the permanent revocation of an attorney’s license to practice law. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Can you tell me a bit about the situation for press freedom in the context in which you’re working? [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:06 am
Whether they’re in Micronesia or Australia, it doesn’t matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
This opinion of the California Supreme Court -- in response to the Ninth Circuit's certified question -- is unanimous, and reading Justice Evans' opinion, you can potentially see why. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
