Search for: "In re David B."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:32 am
—and (b) the music business: who owned the publishing rights and how they got them, who owned the masters and what they did with them, who decided which tracks went on which albums or on 45s (remember 45s?) [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:00 am
” SEC Rule 240.21F-4(b)(4)(iii)(B) provides for this 120-exception for compliance and audit whistleblowers. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
[Re St. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
David S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The Restoration and Re-Establishment: 1660-1701, Russell Sandberg (Cardiff University, UK)6. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Additionally, we’re pleased to welcome Afruz Sayah as an Associate and Stephanie Cepeda as a Paralegal for the Corporate and Transactional practice group. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
In Re St. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
David Isaacson, Apr. 9, 2024 "On March 7, 2024, the Republican-led U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
Re-analyses can be important, but these reanalyses of published Bendectin studies were post hoc, litigation driven, and obviously result oriented. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
And I think they’re very meaningful. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
The Susan B. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
The destruction without a faculty of a wooden pulpit directed to be retained under a previous faculty; b. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am
Juror Demographics b. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:21 am
B! [read post]
