Search for: "In Re: Adoption of R.C."
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am
And the court distinguished In re Adoption of Ridenour (Ohio 1991), which held that: … R.C. 3107.15 reflects the legislature's intent to find families for children. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
In re Estate of Pittston, 2009-Ohio-1862 (5th Dist.) [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
”) In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 63 Ohio St.3d 127 (1992) (R.C. 3107.07(A) requires one year of “nonsupport. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
In re Estate of Pittston, 2009-Ohio-1862 (5th Dist.) [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
In re Kelleher, 2009-Ohio-2960 (7th Dist.) [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
In re Kelleher, 2009-Ohio-2960 (7th Dist.) [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
In re Adoption of B.I.,2019-Ohio-2450. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
In re D.J., 2018-Ohio-569 (2018) (9th Dist.) [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
So, the legislature has made a specific choice to allow courts to adopt affirmative defenses in these cases as long as they comport with due process. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
Chief Justice O’Connor harshly disagreed with Kennedy’s interpretation of R.C. 2953.21(A)(1). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) (the prosecution must prove every element of a crime “beyond a reasonable doubt” for the defendant to be convicted.) [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
R.C. 2950.99 (Penalty provisions for sexually oriented offenses.) [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
In re Anderson, 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67 (2001) (juvenile courts are civil and not criminal courts and should therefore focus on rehabilitation and care of the child.) [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
This appeal should not be about re-litigating the facts of the case. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
In Re Adoption of A.N.W., 2016-Ohio-463 (7th Dist.) [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Mozilla stated “ If you’re still not sure why you’d want to block cookies, today we’re launching a project called Track THIS to help you recognize what they do”. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
In Re Adoption of M.B., 2012-Ohio-236 (De minimis monetary gifts from a biological parent to a minor child do not constitute maintenance and support, because they are not payments as required by law or judicial decree as R.C. 3107.07(A) requires.) [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
”) In re M.A., 2016-Ohio-1161 (11th Dist.) [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
This case differs from In Re Adoption of M.B. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
R.C. 9.75 effectively proscribes the mandates of the Fannie Lewis Law. [read post]
