Search for: "In Re: Amendment of Section 9 of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
” (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
Advisers that are not registered may still wish to review their procedures and/or implement a compliance program as a best practice.Form ADV Annual Amendment. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Following M&F Worldwide, the Supreme Court issued Robert A. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
However, at an increasing frequency in the early to mid-2000s, when the Gallery sold art pieces, it spent the sale proceeds on its own operating expenses even though the gallery had been required by Section 12.01 to keep those artist sale proceeds as “trust funds”. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
GA Code § 17-7-54 How does the special purpose grand jury operate? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
They operate as a branch in Kenya. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA.[46] As the Supreme Court observed, “[e]xtraordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest words,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]’” and that Congress does not “typically use oblique or elliptical language to empower an agency to make a ‘radical or fundamental change’ to a statutory sche [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
But it has been the invigoration of a more muscular federalism, with what appears to be a willingness by the US Supreme Court to re-imagine the division of authority between states and the national government, that is now providing substantial impetus for a vigorous debate about ESG beyond the conversations traditionally driven by elites in apex public and private institutions. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
[s]o they do not internalize the costs of a wild goose chase like this one. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Furthermore, on a proper construction of sections 9 and 10 of the Crimes Ordinance, the prosecution is required to prove that the defendant cannot benefit from the “defence” stated in section 9(2) of the Crimes Ordinance, and that the defendant had a seditious intention when he did the act complained of. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Attorneys have effectively further re-delegated the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to the Assistant U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
by Dennis Crouch It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare,[7] so long as they are genuinely held and not misleading when considered in their full context. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In parallel with the DoH consultation on the revision of Required Standard Operating Procedures, (RSOPs), for independent clinics, other issues relevant to abortion have come into the public domain either as a result of internal action such as that by the Care Quality Commission or externally through media investigations. (21 January 2014). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
