Search for: "In Re: G., Jonathan"
Results 1 - 20
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:12 am
” According to the Washington Post, Witthoeft added that Trump “said to pass that on to the guys inside that they’re on his mind, and when he gets in they’ll get out. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Jonathan F. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
TrafFix, 58 USPQ2d at 1006-07; In re Becton, Dickinson, 102 USPQ2d at 1378; Valu Eng’g, 61 USPQ2d at 1427. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
James G. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
”Jonathan C., executive “I use LII constantly in my work. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Endnotes 1Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Endnotes 1Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Roberson, Jonathan Blaha, Kathleen Hyer, and Austin G. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Roberson, Jonathan Blaha, Kathleen Hyer, and Austin G. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
At the FDIC, Vice Chair Travis Hill and board member Jonathan McKernan voted against issuing the Capital Proposal and issued strong statements sharply critical of the Capital Proposal, particularly the deviation from the Endgame Standard. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am
Jonathon Held also noted that “the rules” of appraisal need to be re-examined. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
