Search for: "In Re: G.L."
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” In re Custody of G.L., 2017 IL App (1st) 163171 An Illinois divorce court is going to use the evidence presented and the court’s own best judgment to determine who the child will be with at any given time. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
See, e.g., In re Benjamin, 33 Mass. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:59 am
“In 2013, the defendant … was indicted on two counts alleging aggravated statutory rape pursuant to G.L. c.265, §23A. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:55 am
”’” The Court rejected the defendant’s position, which “would require the Commonwealth to re-arrest any individual who previously had been released on conditions after a dangerousness hearing in the District Court, or released under G.L. c.276, §58, should the Commonwealth seek a dangerousness hearing following an indictment and subsequent arraignment in the Superior Court. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
Governor Baker re-filed the current version of the bill in February 2019, but it has remained with the Joint Committee on the Judiciary on Beacon Hill for the past nine months. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:29 pm
The Court found that although G.L. c. 268A Section 19 prohibits participation in decisions by municipal officials involving financial conflicts of interest, “the request for invalidation of a decision must come from the Zoning Board itself. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
In re G.L., 329 Ill.App.3d 18 (1st 2002)-Mother’s parental rights terminated where she did not visit her five kids for over two years before the termination hearing. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:28 am
When people are afraid that they’re being recorded and that their words might be used against them later, communications are hampered, and that makes it harder to get work done. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
Our legal team handles zoning issues, mortgages and re-financing, home purchase and sale agreements, and more. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
He also argued that those activities were foreseeable stresses that re-awakened the compensable injury. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether theDuracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
According to G.L. c. 152 section 25A(2)(b) and (c), the self-insurer secured a bond from XL Reinsurance, purchased reinsurance, and then denied a request for reimbursement by XL, according to the reinsurance agreement. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:08 pm
Ultimately, the Court ruled that §15A is not part of the power of sale, G.L. c. 183, §21, or the applicable foreclosure statutes. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
The case addresses the application and interpretation of the property tax exemption applied to religious houses of worship in G.L. c. 59, §5, Clause Eleventh, and raises First Amendment freedom of religion issues and potentially sweeping consequences for churches and other faith-based organizations. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
[At their arraignments,] [p]ursuant to G.L. c.276, §38, probable cause hearings were scheduled for [both] defendant[s,] [in order] to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to bind them over to the Superior Court for trial. [read post]
