Search for: "In Re: John F." Results 1 - 20 of 3,353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
But if Trump is re-elected he will not allow the deep state to again block presidential will. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:25 am
” In re Pennington Seed, Inc., 466 F.3d 1053, 1058 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by jonathanturley
As with the Field of Dreams, if you re-build it, “they will come” back to the Post. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm by Michael Lowe
  Federal criminal defense lawyers will fight for those accused of serious things like: Federal tax fraud Money laundering Drug trafficking Health care fraud Human trafficking RICO (racketeering) Criminal conspiracy Mail fraud and wire fraud Immigration violations (entry or re-entry) Firearms violations. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
I introduce this topic in the beginning of On Sex and Gender: [i]f you're reading this book, you already know that the words we use to talk about sex and gender are contested, starting with sex and gender themselves—but also woman and female, man and male, transgender, and so on. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
The false alternate slate of electors was a “critical” part of the Trump-John Eastman conspiracy, according to a federal district court opinion issued in June. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:36 pm by Ron Coleman
John Welch reports, at the TTABlog, about what you’d think would be a no-brainer: The Board affirmed a refusal to register the configuration shown below, for “electric skillets,” finding that Preston’s proof of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f) was inadequate. [read post]