Search for: "In Re: Petition of Jacobs (Complete Opinion)"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am
I. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
When Prince died in 2016, Condé Nast contacted AWF for permission to re-publish the 1984 illustration in a special issue devoted to Prince. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am
The false alternate slate of electors was a “critical” part of the Trump-John Eastman conspiracy, according to a federal district court opinion issued in June. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:29 pm
The good news is you’re not alone. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Postal Service Overhauls Leadership as Democrats Press for Investigation of Mail Delays Anchorage Daily News – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/7/2020 The Postal Service announced a reorganization meant to increase efficiency as Democratic lawmakers demanded an inquiry into whether changes by President Trump’s officials could threaten the effective use of mail-in ballots for the November election. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
The legislation also spells out in detail exactly how petitions must be formatted, with language allowing legal challenges if the forms are not in “strict compliance” with those standards. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
It is complete on his side who offers it. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
Jacobs)28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
There’s also a split among lower courts on this very issue, as the petition (cowritten by our very own John Elwood) also explains. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
I think there are many First Amendment problems with the North Carolina Supreme Court decision, and the petition for Supreme Court review filed in this case (Packingham v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
We say au revoir to our remaining relist from last week, Jacobs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
The Court will now actually disclose when it is revising its opinions, will archive web pages mentioned in opinions to avoid “link rot,” and has eliminated our day job as professional line-standers. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
With today’s orders list, the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in six cases and chose four petitions for oral argument this fall. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
During that time, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:27 am
Jacob TrakhtenbergSitting on a parole board must be tough. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
For the hearings, the reports and, very importantly, the scores of floor statements on the 1970 Act and the 1978 Amendments reveal Congressional intent completely at odds with the use of CICO. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
" It correctly attributes this standard to Justice Mathew's Gobind opinion. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
Judge Jacobs disagreed. [read post]
