Search for: "In Re Barrick"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
The re-emergence of the mega-deal. 2018 and 2019 have seen a number of deals that are noteworthy not just for their size, but for their implications to the mining landscape. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Thomas University · Charlie Wing and the Alberta Liquor Control Board: Anti-Chinese Racism and the Liquor Laws in Post-Prohibition Alberta—Sarah Hamill, School of Law, Trinity College Dublin · Law, Liberalism, and the Red Scare—Laura Weinrib, University of Chicago · Policing Vice, 1776-1876—David Thacher, University of… [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:59 am
Matthew DeMichele, Peter Baumgartner, Michael Wenger, Kelle Barrick, Megan Comfort and Shilpi Misra (RTI International, RTI International, RTI International, RTI International, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and RTI International) have posted The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-Validation and Assessment... [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
The legal process was used by an individual who complained that Globe24th.com, a site hosted and operated from Romania, was re-publishing decisions of Canadian courts and tribunals containing personal information including personal information about him, for the purpose of demanding fees from aggrieved persons to take the content down. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Thereafter, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the previous decisions were reversed and that court held that the communications from the attorney to the expert were not discoverable. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:28 am
Well, it has been a long, strange trip for Barrick v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 6:11 pm
In Human Rights Council Resolution 17/4 (June 7, 2011) the Human Rights Council endorsed the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights for implementing the "Protect, Respect, and Remedy" Framework (A/HRC/17/31) presented by John Ruggie, the former Special Representative of the Secretary General. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 am
Ver info de ese entonces aquí) Barrick Explotaciones c/ Estado Nacional (Pascua Lama), 03/07/2012, PDF. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Recently, the court granted allocatur to squarely address this issue in Barrick v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Then, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed and held that these communications were not discoverable. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
Last year, the Superior Court sent a shiver through the bar with its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
On April 5, 2011, I attended the re-argument of the Barrick v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
As the writer of the amicus brief on behalf of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute in favor of the defense position, I just received notification from the Pennsylvania Superior Court that the Re-Argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Tort Talkers may recall that, on November 19, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court granted the Plaintiff’s Petition for Re-argument and withdrew its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Tort Talkers may recall that, on November 19, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court granted the Plaintiff’s Petition for Re-argument and withdrew its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
In a Sept. 16 opinion, the panel rejected a plaintiff's contention that letters and e-mails discussing trial strategy sent between a party's expert witness and that party's attorney are discoverable were protected by the attorney work product doctrine.The plaintiff argued in Barrick v. [read post]
