Search for: "In Re Betts" Results 1 - 20 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 6:58 am
"Writes Hannah Betts, in "We’re ‘dinkwads’ and proud of it — it’s the new normal Hannah Betts on the joy of being ‘dual income, no kids, with a dog'" (London Times).The "dinkwads" slang I can absorb, but what's up with that "in their/our pants"? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm by Aaron Moss
Ford Motor Co., the court rejected Bette Midler’s section 3344 claim in connection with a Ford television commercial in which a Midler soundalike sang a song that Midler had made famous. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
Cacophony tours internationally with Atlantis Events, performing her Bette Midler tribute, “Wanna Bette? [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Betts, 558 NE 2d 404 – Ill: Appellate Court, 4th Dist. 1990 Civil contempt of court must be imposed to encourage good behavior…not just to punish. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:34 am by Russell Knight
Barasch, 21 Ill. 2d 407, 410 (Ill. 1961)  “The contemnor must be capable of taking the action sought to be coerced” In re Marriage of Betts, 200 Ill. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm by Aaron Moss
And we’re happy to have the opportunity to be very, very clear about our view of the legal landscape. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am by Aaron Moss
When you listen to music on the radio or a streaming service, you’re technically hearing both the composition as well as the sound recording of that composition. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:23 am by SHG
When you go to a Broadway show, the show is what you’re buying. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am by Giles Peaker
Significantly, Lord Slynn at paragraph 18 of Mohamed  (Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2001) UKHL 57 ) re-considered the approach taken to ‘normal residence’ as discussed in R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex p Nilish Shah (1983) 2 AC 309, 343, upon which Betts was based, and made clear that “the prima facie meaning of normal residence is a place where at the relevant time the person in fact resides…..and it is not appropriate to consider… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am by Shea Denning
Finally, the jury asked to re-watch the surveillance video of the shooting during its closing argument. [read post]