Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 1 - 20
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
” Instead, the panel supports its “analysis” of the publisher/distributor distinction with two citations: (1) the 2011 Shiamili case (which, in its only reference to “distributor,” says “we took note of the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Zeran and its robust understanding of CDA immunity as encompassing both publisher and distributor liability“–emphasis added), and (2) an obscure 2013 West Virginia Law Review article written by a general… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
” Reminder: we’re talking about content publication, not Ford Pintos or exploding Coke bottles. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
JASON KELLEYI'm wondering if you're surprised by the way that things have turned out in any specific instance, you know, you had a lot of responsibility for some really important legislation for CDA 230, scaling back some NSA spying issues, helping to stop SOPA-PIPA, which are all, you know, really important to EFF and to a lot of our listeners and supporters. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
” [Cite to In re Zoom] Finally, the CDA does not require Stratics to distribute content over the internet. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I still haven’t blogged last year’s In re Social Media Addiction rulings from the California federal and state courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
To hold GMB liable under the facts of this case would clearly violate the provisions of the CDA. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
We’re on the cusp of [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
So the CDA’s textual inconsistency only “strains credulity” if one completely ignores the legislative manufacturing process that created the CDA. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
If you’re new to FOSTA cases and you are baffled by the layers of inferences and arguments here, you are definitely not alone. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:54 am
” 22 years later, I guess we’re still litigating that conclusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:23 pm
Under the CDA, a contractor has 90 days from the date of receiving a COFD to appeal the decision to the relevant agency board. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:01 am
I guess we’re going to have to do it all over again. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Their case was recently dismissed on the basis of Section 230 of the CDA, although the court has left the door open for them to re-file their complaint. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
This is a baby CDA bill that was deemed unconstitutional 20+ years ago. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Chen also ruled that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) gave Twitter immunity from Al-Ahmed’s federal claims. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 8:27 pm
The court noted that the complaint largely referred to “Zealand” as a single entity and did not make clear whether and how Zealand US was involved, but because Zealand US was not formed until after the CDA came into force, the “claims stated against ‘Zealand’ as a combined entity [we]re not sufficient to put Defendants on notice as to which claims pertain to Zealand [US]. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
We further reject Prager’s argument that the CDA—foreclosing as it does Prager’s causes of action against private actors—violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 7:32 am
Such conduct constitutes publishing functions under CDA Section 230. [read post]
Section 230 Doesn’t Protect App Stores That Sell Virtual Chips for Casino Apps–In re Apple App Store
6 Sep 2022, 9:25 am
HP (re the Chubby Checker). [read post]
