Search for: "In Re Digital Millennium Copyright Act" Results 1 - 20 of 637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by Mitch Stoltz
The notice-and-takedown system created by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, for example, is abused time and again by people who claim to be enforcing their copyrights, and also by folks who simply want to make speech they don’t like disappear from the Internet. [read post]
On February 28, two suits were filed by news media organizations against OpenAI, alleging that OpenAI violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by training the ChatGPT LLM with copies of their works from which content management information had been removed. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:46 am by Katherine O'Brien
If you own the copyright to the content, invoking your rights under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) can be an effective removal strategy. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:28 am by Evan Brown
Some copyright owners needed to find out who was anonymously infringing their works, so they issued a subpoena to the users’ internet service provider (Cox Communications) under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (“DMCA”) at 17 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
Vinay Jonge's act of putting his name to our song, standing alone, doesn't infringe our copyright. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:45 am by Katharine Trendacosta
We are all so used to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the safe harbor it provides that we sometimes forget how extraordinary the relief it provides really is. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:12 am by Katharine Trendacosta
For example, while 1998’s Digital Millennium Copyright Act helped spur the growth of platforms for creating and sharing art, music and literature, it also helped make the phrase “blocked due to a claim by the copyright holder” so ubiquitous. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:41 am by Michael C. Dorf
In addition to its other claims, the NY Times complaint includes an allegation that, in training its LLMs, OpenAI removed digital rights management code from NY Times material in violation of a provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:56 am by Erica Canas
Copyright Officefiling fees between $45 to $85registrations are generally granted to applicants so long as the work meets the minimum originality standardscan take up to 3 months to registerTrademark Registrationprotects names, logos and other branding that are used to identify the source of particular goods or servicesregistration involves filing an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)filing fees between $250 and $350 for each class of… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm by Cory Doctorow
Laws like Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as well as patents and copyrights create serious civil and criminal jeopardy for technologists who investigate these technologies. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm by INFORRM
The hosting liability regime was – and is – similar to the notice and takedown model of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act – and significantly different from the US S.230 Communications Decency Act 1996, which was more closely akin to full conduit immunity. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
The hosting liability regime was – and is – similar to the notice and takedown model of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act – and significantly different from the US S.230 Communications Decency Act 1996, which was more closely akin to full conduit immunity. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Yesterday, I saw that someone tried to use a different scheme, which I briefly mentioned in the article (pp. 300-01), to try to deindex the Utah Law Review version of my article: They sent a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice to Google claiming that they owned the copyright in my article, and that the Utah Law Review version was an unauthorized copy of the version that I had posted on my own site: (That's a copy of the takedown demand… [read post]
The suit, which was filed in the Northern District of California, alleges violations of federal as well as state copyright laws, including “direct copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement related to forgeries, violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), violation of class members’ rights of publicity, breach of contract related to the DeviantArt Terms of Service, and various violations of… [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:09 pm by Corynne McSherry
Lawyers, scholars, and activists, including EFF, often highlight Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Section 230 (originally of the Communications Decency Act) as the legal foundations of the internet. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 9:01 am by Jason Kelley
  In another remote proctoring fight, EFF client Erik Johnson, a Miami University computer engineering undergraduate, reached a settlement in the lawsuit we brought on his behalf against exam surveillance software maker Proctorio, in a victory for fair use of copyrighted material and people’s right to fight back against bad faith Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedowns used to silence critics. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
A computer scientist and an inventor challenge the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that make it illegal to bypass computer code used to block unauthorized access to copyrighted materials. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:31 pm by Kit Walsh
We partnered with law firm Wilson Sonsini to file this case in 2016 because Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act violates the First Amendment by threatening security research, remix video, media literacy education, access to culture for disabled people, and even the right to understand how your car works so you can repair it. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Terry Hart
In 2001, the Register of Copyrights and the Assistant Secretary for Communication and Information of the Department of Commerce prepared a report in compliance with § 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, which recommended against expanding the first sale doctrine to digital transmissions. [read post]