Search for: "In Re Elster" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2022, 1:16 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The court, wading into the increasingly heated debate over the boundary between trademark law principles and free speech rights, found that the government had no substantial interest in protecting a public official like the former President from having his name used without his consent (In re Steve Elster, February 24, 2022, Dyk, T.). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
For a detailed discussion of the facts of this trademark dispute, see my spring 2023 guest post on the Technology & Marketing Law Blog about the Federal Circuit’s opinion in In re Elster and fall 2023 post on this blog after the Supreme Court oral argument in Vidal v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
Elster is a trademark dispute at the Supreme Court focused on the issue of whether Steve Elster has a free speech right to register a political message (“Trump Too Small”) as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Justin Levitt
We’re waiting for several big SCOTUS cases with a tie to this blog’s content. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Meanwhile, Elster was essentially arguing for a type of unconstitutional conditions analysis. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am by Ronald Mann
” Because “you’re not talking about stopping the speech,” Sotomayor said, “[t]he question is, is this an infringement on speech? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:43 pm by Anthony J. Noonan
”  In re Steve Elster, Case No. 20-2205, Dkt. #57, at p. 2 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:25 am
In short, pending the outcome of In re Elster (the TRUMP TOO SMALL case) at the Supreme Court, the Office will suspend action on pending applications involving marks subject to refusal under section 2(c). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:05 am
In re Steve Elster, Serial No. 87749230 (July 2, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]