Search for: "In Re Federal Communications Commission, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
FCC begins: In 2018, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an order classifying broadband Internet access service as an information service under Title I of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:08 am by Brendan Holland
The Commission is taking additional time to address certain issues raised by petitioners and to revise the new form further. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit vacated key portions of the Federal Communications Commission’s “Open Internet Order” — aka the net neutrality” rule. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:27 am by Jenna Greene
Civil rights and conservative groups have banded together to form an unlikely coalition to ask the Federal Communications Commission to end "exorbitant" fees that many prisons charge inmates to make phone calls. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
The standard should instead be that the command was taking reasonable efforts to ensure that attorney-client communications were confidential. [read post]
Last week we published an overview of key issues raised by the Federal Communications Commission’s July 10, 2015, Declaratory Ruling and Order regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “July 2015 Order”). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:54 am
To see the ongoing rulemaking documents, consult In re Effects of Communications Towers on Migratory Birds, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”), 21 F.C.C.R. 13,241 (2006). [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 7:44 am by David Oxenford
At an open meeting held on December 1, 2022, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) adopted new disclaimer requirements for internet-based political advertising, including the identification of the ad sponsor. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm   Hart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
“In finding petitioners liable for deceptive ads, the Commission determined that petitioners’ efficacy and establishment claims were misleading because they were  unsubstantiated by RCTs. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 30. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am by Matt Cooper
Wisconsin Election Commissioners, the Wisconsin Supreme Court denied the petitioners’ request for a declaration that the Wisconsin Elections Commission communicated illegal advice to county clerks regarding absentee ballot drop boxes, and that the court should prevent the certification of Wisconsin’s Presidential election results. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:31 pm by Matt Cooper
Wisconsin Election Commissioners, a petition was filed in the Wisconsin Supreme Court alleging that the Wisconsin Elections Commission communicated illegal interpretations of state law to county clerks regarding the use of absentee ballot drop boxes. [read post]