Search for: "In Re International Corporation Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 8:20 am
More recently, the co-legislators adopted heavily debated rules for sustainability disclosures by corporates, as well as a framework for ESG rating providers. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
Henchman is used by leading law firms and corporations to enrich internal work product, creating a layer of intelligence on contract databases to accelerate drafting tasks. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
You don’t have to be certain that there is one.[12] While decisions around any internal investigations are yours to make, you also don’t need to conduct a complete internal investigation before coming in and speaking with us.[13] The key here is to be upfront about what you’re still looking at and let us know if your understanding of the facts later change. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:11 am
And I’m joined by a special co host today, Toby. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
”; quoting In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
Before joining Seeger Weiss’ Pennsylvania office, Ben spent the last twenty years at Dechert LLP, a global Am Law 100 firm with domestic and international clients, where he focused on data and eDiscovery issues associated with high-stakes litigations and corporate investigations, including Takata Airbag Litigation and the Vioxx Litigation. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:28 am
When internal conflicts arise in a business, whether it’s corporate oppression or a partnership dispute, the repercussions can be significant. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:08 am
Big corporations try to co-opt and control these communities, and politicians often promote scary narratives about technology’s dangerous influences, but users have pushed back against monopoly and rhetoric to find new ways to connect with each other [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
18 May 2024, 8:52 am
Focarelli, International Law as Social Construct: The Struggle for Global Justice, Oxford, 2012.3 Cfr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Firm leadership may openly discuss among its personnel what went wrong; use the underlying violations as an opportunity to teach and instill in all staff the critical importance of professional integrity, ethics, and serving the public trust; and possibly internally sanction, terminate, or suspend the audit partner. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
" Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Dick Co. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am
Banjo Corporation v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Heitner2, the Supreme Court began by outlining the breadth (and as importantly, the limits) of the long-arm statute stating that “to ensure consistency with due process, the court applies the ‘minimum contacts’ test set forth in International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:51 pm
Walters: I think you’re right about in-house counsel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:56 am
Following this review, the Parliament and Council need to re-confirm the text ahead of official publication. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
This court has clarified, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
