Search for: "In Re Kurtzman"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
But they're wrong to classify those paragraphs as originalist analysis. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
Kurtzman (1971) applies to Establishment Clause claims, but the continuing validity of the Lemon endorsement test is doubtful. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:59 pm
Kurtzman, for establishment clause cases – “in two decades,” Kavanaugh observed. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:11 pm
Kurtzman (1605-1611) / (880-883) Marsh v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Kurtzman, one of the attributes of a law or policy that brings First Amendment suspicion upon it is “entanglement. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Kurtzman, had held in 2017 that the display unconstitutionally endorsed Christianity and ordered its removal from public land. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Kurtzman, Van Orden v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Thanks to Kent Piacenti for re-upping to do a few more installments. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Circuit in In re Navy Chaplaincy, which invites the Supreme Court’s review. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Kurtzman (1972), which requires that the challenged government policy be motivated by a “secular purpose. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
It’s been a busy 24 hours in the increasingly fascinating relationship between President Trump and the federal judiciary. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:09 am
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 612 (1971). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Kurtzman and numerous other cases. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
Kurtzman, because the original Lemon was unworkable. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Kurtzman and later cases interpreting those factors. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:33 pm
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the settlement administrator. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
Kurtzman), refuses to repair a plumbing and wiring problem because the Jonathan Pryce character doesn't have the right form. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 7:00 pm
In a case at the intersection of Kelo-style eminent domain and First Amendment church-state issues, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in In re Condemnation of 1839 North Eighth Street, No. 36 EAP 2006 (Dec. 29, 2007), held that the taking of property designated as "blighted" pursuant to a redevelopment plan, and for a nominal price transferring it to a religious entity did not violate the U.S. [read post]
