Search for: "In Re Lang"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 5:06 am
You're one of those guys who thinks about the Roman Empire every day, aren't you? [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:18 pm
Singer k.d. lang was scheduled to perform. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am
This can be done concurrently with re-sitting the failed papers M, but those papers will only be marked if the candidate passes paper F. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
We’re their witnesses. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
They're a little creepy. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
In this case, Rolex argued that the defendant’s customization work, which required it to remove and then re-apply Rolex trade marks on the dials alongside the atelier’s own trade mark, amounted to trade mark infringement. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:41 am
Und das schon lange vor der DSGVO. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
” Alan Lange & Tom Dawson, Kings of Torts 87 (2d ed. 2010) (quoting convicted former lawyer, Zach Scruggs) Back in the 1980s, I started to see expert witnesses stray into the business of psychoanalysis of corporate defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
Salma Triki, “La compétence internationale tunisienne et le critère de nationalité” in Ben Achour/Triki (eds.), Le Code de droit international privé – Vingt ans d’application (1998-2018) (Latrach edition, 2020) 119ff). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:33 am
It’s not how real litigation systems work, they’re much more flexible. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Im Ausland, wo wir in der EU wären, wäre es unklar. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am
Fee for re-establishment of rights/fee for requesting restoration/fee for reinstatement of rights 685 720 750 30 4.2% 14. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 pm
Es gibt Leute, die sagen, es sei lange ein Mauerblümchen gewesen in den Debatten und es habe eine riesige Lawine bekommen. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:21 am
A second instance decision is “re-examination” and not examination, as also indicated in Opinion #00016/2023/CGPI/PFE-INPI/PGF/AGU – published in BRPTO´s Official gazette #2762 on December 12, 2023 – when addressing formal issues to administrative appeals. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
On December 12, 2023, the President of the BRPTO gave a normative and binding character to four Opinions of the Specialized Federal Attorney’s Office, imposing restrictions on the actions available to applicants when appealing first instance decisions. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:57 am
We’re here to break down the key insights and details of the FAQs so you can start 2024 off on the right foot, including compliance requirements for January 1, coordination with local ordinances, exemption information, and medical documentation guidelines. [read post]
