Search for: "In Re Lange" Results 1 - 20 of 1,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 4:03 am by Jasmijn de Groot (Brinkhof)
Although it is up for discussion whether this English translation is correct or not (as I re-translated a Dutch translation of an English claim into English), most relevant is that the Dutch translation gave the bed multiple openings (by using the plural form of the word opening). [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am by Nina Ferara (Porsche AG)
This can be done concurrently with re-sitting the failed papers M, but those papers will only be marked if the candidate passes paper F. [read post]
  As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
In this case, Rolex argued that the defendant’s customization work, which required it to remove and then re-apply Rolex trade marks on the dials alongside the atelier’s own trade mark, amounted to trade mark infringement. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
” Alan Lange & Tom Dawson, Kings of Torts 87 (2d ed. 2010) (quoting convicted former lawyer, Zach Scruggs) Back in the 1980s, I started to see expert witnesses stray into the business of psychoanalysis of corporate defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Salma Triki, “La compétence internationale tunisienne et le critère de nationalité” in Ben Achour/Triki (eds.), Le Code de droit international privé – Vingt ans d’application (1998-2018) (Latrach edition, 2020) 119ff). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Fee for re-establishment of rights/fee for requesting restoration/fee for reinstatement of rights 685 720 750 30 4.2% 14. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Es gibt Leute, die sagen, es sei lange ein Mauerblümchen gewesen in den Debatten und es habe eine riesige Lawine bekommen. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
A second instance decision is “re-examination” and not examination, as also indicated in Opinion #00016/2023/CGPI/PFE-INPI/PGF/AGU – published in BRPTO´s Official gazette #2762 on December 12, 2023 – when addressing formal issues to administrative appeals. [read post]
On December 12, 2023, the President of the BRPTO gave a normative and binding character to four Opinions of the Specialized Federal Attorney’s Office, imposing restrictions on the actions available to applicants when appealing first instance decisions. [read post]