Search for: "In Re Mtm"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
The judge isn’t hearing that they’re not counterfeiters. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
MTM cases: you can agree w/outcomes or not, but decisions are really nuanced. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
So we’re close to having this doctrine but courts won’t yet take the final step. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
” The fact that “its Fyrosity mark appears multiple times on the results webpage” is no different than the MTM case. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am
The court treats this as a straightforward application of the MTM v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:54 am
They're are putting judges in Pods. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
MTM comes out the other way, consumers get different choices and behave differently b/c product mix is now different. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
Implicitly, Belmora etc. are courts saying “you’re not necessarily violating rights but going further means you’re not engaging in behavior w/any social value. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Inverted U phenomenon we’re arguing for is limited to those super-strong marks. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:18 am
I did just that many times watching MTM, loving it all the while. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
The court doesn’t discuss the 9th Circuit’s Multi-Time Machine (MTM) v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
MTM makes higher-end watches and doesn’t permit them to be sold on Amazon. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
MTM; Tiffany v. eBay; even Rescuecom. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am
As our amicus pointed out, “no results for MTM special ops, but what about MTM Black Cobra? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
And the terrible MTM v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
But they’re not likely to affirmatively state “We don’t have MTM Special Ops” watches. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
In other words, we’re not worried about the likelihood of damage to the trademark holder because a confused person buys the competitor’s goods thinking they are the trademark holder’s goods. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
MTM appealed. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
I’ll blog the MTM case separately.] [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
Weak or strong, the question is whether it’s clear you’re being offered an alternative. [read post]
