Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 1 - 20
of 14,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
It is by Justice Kagan and the vote is 6-3. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
They’re both thoughtful and independent; they each bring a lot to the Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
The conversation covered a variety of areas where misinformation created disharmony between fact and public opinion. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am
. They’re asking the court to declare that state officials have breached their duties “to preserve, protect, and maintain public trust resources for present and future generations” by essentially not acting fast enough to transition the state’s infrastructure away from fossil fuels. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
Ideally, the legal system works to uphold justice and fairness, and defendants have the opportunity to fight back against this presumption of negligence. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
le juge Bachand, à l’opinion duquel souscrit le juge Hamilton: Le juge de première instance a commis des erreurs de droit en analysant la question de la capacité de la victime à consentir aux actes sexuels. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:43 pm
," "WE'RE COMING for U" and "We are everywhere. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Circuit: We're sure it is. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Res judicata also bars plaintiff from relitigating his prior appeals, and his arguments for recusal of Justices who participated in those appeals are entirely unsupported by evidence. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Res judicata also bars plaintiff from relitigating his prior appeals, and his arguments for recusal of Justices who participated in those appeals are entirely unsupported by evidence. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
I imagined that the Court could write a "Christmas tree of an opinion" with something for everyone except Justice Alito--who would consider anything other than full-scale Gilead to be the equivalent of a lump of coal.Yesterday's unanimous opinion by Justice Kavanaugh mostly vindicates my assessment. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Justices are even allowed to have strong opinions about controversial issues in dinner conversations. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
To do this the assistance of experts is required, but different experts may have differing opinions in related cases.[24] Currently, Slovenian cultural heritage is protected by the Cultural Heritage Protection Act, which was adopted in 2008 (the Slovenian name of the Act is Zakon o varstvu kulturne dediščine, often cited as ZVKD-1).[25] It provides a modern basis for the legal protection of cultural heritage, as Slovenia has ratified the most important international conventions… [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
We’re not sure yet if the archbishop will listen to the stories of the victims. [read post]
