Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 1 - 20 of 14,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
It is true, as Justice Amy Coney Barrett writes in the majority opinion, that Facebook and Twitter imposed some content moderation restrictions even before any government attempts to pressure them. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(The majority consisted of three conservatives—Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion, and Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh—plus the three liberals, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.) [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 10:04 pm by Melissa Srago
Supreme Court's recent opinions on technology and civil liberties. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
 The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights through its Business and Human Rights Section has initiated a major initiative--the establishment of a helpdesk mechanism on business and human rights. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I'm not even sure they're reading from the same book. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by Josh Blackman
We're left with the Second Amendment merged with some frog DNA. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
In 2024, “they’re completely up for grabs between Biden and Trump. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The 8-1 ruling came with five concurring opinions from other justices — each distinct — that judges and attorneys across the country will also be looking to for guidance. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 pm by Mark Tushnet
Justice Scalia offered one answer in Michael M. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Josh Blackman
A recurring theme in Justice Barrett's opinions is making attorneys work for their case. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 12:56 pm by Shawn Dominy
Wisconsin, a majority of the justices were of the opinion that implied consent does not create actual consent. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am by Michael C. Dorf
Yet, as Chief Justice Roberts lays out in detail in his nearly unanimous opinion for the Court, Rahimi is a decidedly bad guy. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by SHG
Whether they’re representative of the priesthood, I can’t say. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
As Justice Sotomayor twice made clear in the opinion, section 1109(b) provides insurers, qua insurers, neither a vote on nor a veto of a reorganization plan; it provides them with a voice in a bankruptcy case. [read post]