Search for: "In Re Qs"
Results 1 - 20
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Morgan Stanley, 776 F. 3d 94, 101 (CA2 2015) (“Item 303’s affirmative duty to disclose in Form 10–Qs can serve as the basis for a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b)”), with In re Nvidia, 768 F. 3d 1046, 1056 (CA9 2014) (“Item 303 does not create a duty to disclose for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b–5”); see also Oran v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:15 am
That means that companies are going to need to re-audit all of the years covered by a BF Borgers audit report for their next 10-K and re-do prior interim reviews for periods presented in upcoming 10-Qs. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm
In the proposed rule, FDA had proposed requiring manufacturers to “obtain the signature for each individual who approved or re-approved the record” (proposed § 820.35). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm
The Weil team also looked at 10-Qs and proxy statements. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:30 am
More than two-thirds of the sample are 10-K comment letters, and another 18 percent pertain to 10-Qs. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
7106284 FLAMEWORKS APOTHECARY 7106245 TIME-KEEPER 7106059 RA 7105991 RECON SPORTS 7105632 M MADSEN STEEL WIRE PRODUCTS 7105226 LIPPERT INSIGHT 7105099 DIVERSION 7104333 NATRAPEST 7104327 DIAMOND SHINE 7109496 VELLUM 7103945 WHITETAIL VALLEY 7109422 THE BOOK OF SUTEKH 7103798 VONZETTA’S LAVISH HAIR BOUTIQUE 7103712 CLASSIC REDEFINED, SIZES 12W-44W 7103662 DEATHSTALKER DEMIGODS 7103642 DEAD OCEANS 7109277 FIRST ONE DOESN’T COUNT 7103176 AIRSTREAM 7103161 SMOOCHEZ 7109048 GALLERY POPS… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Keller: readers have a right to read what they’re interested in. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Qs: “These companies know everything about us; how can they not know what’s illegal? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
If we’re lookin [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Qs: should she start earlier? [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Maintaining an advantage in pursuing goals b/c of asymmetric information is a different issue that isn’t about benefit, ties this to Qs like insider trading. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
MultiChoice had claimed that the respondents continued to host or allow content from 141 websites that infringed on its rights by re-broadcasting or replicating its exclusive content without authorization. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Roles of formalism and empiricism: Qs today ask about what standards we should use for ornamentality. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:06 pm
QS staff never knew with certainty if an affected pallet was retrieved. [read post]
14 May 2022, 7:02 pm
QS staff never knew with certainty if an affected pallet was retrieved. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:53 pm
QS staff never knew with certainty if an affected pallet was retrieved. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:12 pm
QS staff never knew with certainty if an affected pallet was retrieved. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
On another occasion product was not re-called from the market even after management became aware of a nonconformity (“NC”). [read post]
