Search for: "In Re The Dependency Of: E.m."
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 7:32 am
., In re J.V., 212 N.C.App. 205, 208 (2011) (finding error when the trial court failed to advise the juvenile of their privilege against self-incrimination before testifying) and In re E.M., 263 N.C.App. 476, 478 (2019) (finding error when the trial court failed to refer the juvenile to the area mental health services director as required by the statute at that time). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
Appellate courts have acknowledged the right to appeal a dispositional order entered after a motion for review on a probation violation (In re E.M., 263 N.C.App. 476 (2019), In re K.N.H., 278 N.C.App. 27 (2021)) and a dispositional order entered following a motion for review and extension of probation supervision (In re H.D.H., 269 N.C.App. 409 (2020)). [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm
We further conclude that the exercise of due diligence under this provision is flexible and depends on the circumstances of, and the information presented to the court in, each case. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:05 am
See In re E.M., 263 N.C.App. 476 (2019). [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
Indeed, when E.M. [read post]
