Search for: "In re: B. R."
Results 1 - 20
of 12,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
Die Bestätigung an den EDÖB ist dennoch eine hilfreiche Information für Nutzer von Facebook und Instagram. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
They're anticipated to ask for attorney's fees of $6 billion -- that's billion, with a b.) [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
25, citing Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
First, the Court addressed the second plea, alleging infringement of Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Counterman had sent Whalen thousands of messages which included texts such as: “Staying in cyber life is going to kill you,” “You’re not being good for human relations. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
The Federal Circuit granted the motion to remand (In re Xencor Inc., No. 23-2048 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Querino v Cambridge City Council (Rev1) (2024) EWCA Civ 314 We’re a bit late to this one. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
You’re waving a firearm around to display that it’s on your person even if you don’t intend on firing it You store your firearms loaded You transport your firearms loaded You fail to use a locking device on certain firearms when storing them Defences A strong defence to a charge of unsafe storage of a firearm will depend on the circumstances of one’s case. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Accessing child pornography (4.1) Every person who accesses any child pornography is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
En l’espèce, l’appelant ne saurait bénéficier de sa conduite empreinte de mauvaise foi. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm
In a recent decision (R 1397-2022-5), the Fifth Board of Appeal (the Board) of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) took the unusual step of suspending an opposition appeal so as to remand the trade mark application to the Examiner for an examination on the basis of absolute grounds of refusal. [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:53 am
Moreover, in R. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:53 am
Soo Hong (R). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
