Search for: "In re: Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 12:08 am
And so you're like, well, I better say it because no one else is saying it. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
First, Justice Thomas, as well as Justice Kavanaugh and Barrett, re-upped the professorial theory demand from Brackeen: unless you have a theory to explain how you case meshes with all other precedents, go away: The associations offer no defensible argument that the Appropriations Clause requires more than a law that authorizes the disbursement of specified funds for identified purposes. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:19 pm
” She finished in 22 minutes, 23 seconds.Justice Amy Coney Barrett, 52, who was part of the “Sua Sprinte” team, finished in 26 minutes, 9 seconds. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Last week, the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Barrett Financial Group, LLC, 2024 WL 1856552 (D. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In truth, they're best understood to stand for this far-more-modest proposition, which appears in the 1995 OLC opinion on which Trump places the most weight: “[A] statute that does not by its express terms apply to the President may not be applied to the President if doing so would raise a serious question under the separation of powers. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
And you’re saying that’s an official act? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The justices’ constitutional and policy sympathies are likely to be engaged here, which means they’re more likely to stretch existing law to stop the rule. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
From here, Justice Amy Coney Barrett confirmed that Sauer agreed private actions, separate from official acts, by a former president do not qualify for immunity. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
At the time, Seth Barrett Tillman and I acknowledged the easy case: the President receiving a "suitcase full of money" in exchange for performing some official act would amount to bribery. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
“They’re a vulnerable cohort,” Burgess said. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:18 am
So what you’re showing that firm is that you’re not good at taking on new roles that you’ve never done before. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
And they're not really questions. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:49 am
[David Lat] understands why the left remains traumatized by how Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was replaced by Justice Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:05 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also joined in on this point, questioning if either of the doctors performed an abortion. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
“The statute doesn’t have this sort of safe harbor that you’re suggesting. [read post]
