Search for: "In re: Charles M. James, III." Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Together they describe the epistēmē (understood as "the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable" Foucault, Power/Knowledge (C. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am by Chris Seaton
People respond on Facebook and Twitter by posting pictures of little girls holding Ukrainian flags with captions that read “I’m okay with paying a little more for gas if it helps her. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:06 pm by William Ford, Matt Gluck
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Lloyd Austin III, defense secretary, and Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
Baldwin also provided direct financial support to the NAACP through a foundation set up by Charles Garland, a young Harvard dropout who inherited a fortune he pledged to spend for “the benefit of poor as much as rich, of Black as much as white. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:29 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The first of the four-part panel will cover election administration and  will feature Nick Penniman, founder and CEO of Issue One; Wendy Weiser, vice president for democracy at the Brennan Center for Justice; Charles Stewart III, political science professor at MIT and David Becker, director and founder of the Center for Election Innovation & Research. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
John's Andreas Delgado ADCasteleiro Durham (UK) Michelle M. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
[iii] The Ontario Court of Appeal in the Delrina case,[iv] had favorably commented on the “abstraction-filtration-comparison” methodology, a methodology that is commonly applied in computer program infringement cases in the U.S. to weed out unprotectable portions of a work before comparing the two works. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
I’m sure they would like them even less if the decision they must make is final and irreversible. [read post]